Mb30sdl
Hamster that pokes Bears
- Messages
- 1,588
- Location
- Raleigh area NC
In my opinion SC is better for low rpm (off road use). You get instant linear boost from idle so you can control wheelspin easier.
This is not true on all super chargers, for example the one on my Alpha is kicked on once the vacume pressure is at a certain point (you can hear it kick in).Yes a turbo kicks in at a certain rpm, thats because it gets powered from the exhaust pushing on it. The sc takes power directly from the engine via belts, so its always on.
My understanding is that a SC gives you the sensation of a bigger engine (boost is linear) where turbo tends to be peaky, unless you go variable vane turbo
In my opinion SC is better for low rpm (off road use). You get instant linear boost from idle so you can control wheelspin easier.
That's a generalization based on 40 year old technology. As you pointed out, variable geometry turbos eliminate the lag. For a demonstration, go drive a Ford F150 with the Ecoboost engine. Or any modern turbodiesel. Even a properly sized ball bearing turbo (fixed geometry) will light extremely quickly if sized properly.
True, but what I found is that the manufacturers actually manipulatee the fueling to achieve the smoothness youre referring to, as soon as you remove the limitations you actually feel the "peakyness" of a turbo still, althou you cant feel the lag any more.
One place I can say I have experienced the turbo lag still was at high altitude where I had to revv for 20 seconds to get boost going to pull away and this was only at 3500m above sea level. But what was interesting was that I took both my 3.7 and 5.3 H3's to the same spot and didnt experience any performance loss, interesting
Yup, turbo lag increases with altitude. The reason is pretty basic - exhaust gas spins the turbine. Higher altitude means less pre-boost exhaust flow, which translates to more lag. Again, variable geometry turbos help tremendously. My Cummins takes significantly longer to spool at high altitude, but because of the wastegate configuration I can achieve the same absolute manifold pressure at altitude as at sea level. Thus the engine can make as much power at 3000m+ as sea level.
I guarantee your 3.7 and 5.3 were way down on power. Power loss is proportional to air pressure, which drops with increasing altitude. This is why piston engine aircraft designed for high altitude operation are universally turbocharged. Conventional supercharger systems (i.e. all automotive superchargers) will lose power as well since they operate at fixed pressure ratios. However, they will still have more power than the same engine which is normally aspirated.
So..... My question is where can I get a SC for my 2006 3.5 H3???
No. I have been looking too. They are all out of production.So I'm guessing theres no kits