• Welcome to H4O! For a reduced ad experience, please login or register with the forum.

Republicans eye a return to gold standard

deserth3

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,078
Location
Conroe, TX
Would this be a good thing??

The Republican Party is considering setting up a commission to examine the pros and cons of going back to the gold standard, according to draft documents of the party platform.
The official party platform won't be decided until Monday, but a Republican National Committee spokeswoman confirmed the draft language to CNNMoney.
The commission harkens back to the early 1980s, when President Ronald Reagan set up a Gold Commission with the same intention. Only two members of the 17-member commission endorsed a return to the gold standard. One of them was Rep. Ron Paul, who remains an avid gold supporter.
"Now, three decades later, as we face the task of cleaning up the wreckage of the current Administration's policies, we propose a similar commission to investigate possible ways to set a fixed value for the dollar," the new proposal says.
It's highly unlikely the United States would actually return to the gold standard. The country first moved away from the gold standard in 1933, and dropped it altogether in 1971. Despite support for its return by some on the political right, few mainstream economists support its reinstatement

Full Article....
http://money.cnn.com/2012/08/24/new...campaign=Feed:+rss/money_latest+(Latest+News)
 

Neo

Badfish
Messages
1,666
Location
Brookings, OR
i remember when the government would'nt let you own gold bullion , coins were ok but no bars . that was when the african krugerrand was minted to get around the feds .

i dont think there is enough gold to back the size of our economy . i heard once that all the gold ever mined would be a block about the size of the base to the statue of liberty . with all the gold that india has just in jewelry , i dont think there would be enough for us to scrounge up for a gold standard . i have also heard that most of the gold that was in fort knox has been siphoned off over the years.
 

abearden

Well-Known Member
Messages
609
Location
N. Idaho
Two things:

1. Gold would have to be $7k to $10k an ounce to be anywhere near supporting the economy last I read.

2. There was a question of gold-plated tungsten bars being found in Ft. Knox. a few years back. Not sure what the deal was, but that wouldn't be confirmed either way.
 

Neo

Badfish
Messages
1,666
Location
Brookings, OR
Two things:

1. Gold would have to be $7k to $10k an ounce to be anywhere near supporting the economy last I read.

2. There was a question of gold-plated tungsten bars being found in Ft. Knox. a few years back. Not sure what the deal was, but that wouldn't be confirmed either way.

i have heard the same about the gold-plated tungsten bars . interesting about the economy , so they would just advance the price to match the amount they would need to back the notes printed . thanks for that info
 

abearden

Well-Known Member
Messages
609
Location
N. Idaho
M0 money (cash and coins) for the USD is approximately $908.6B according to the Federal Reserve (http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h41/20090730/). The US holds 4,578 metric tons of gold in deposit (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Bullion_Depository, I know, I know it's a Wiki link). So just to cover the physical USD in existence, gold would have to be $5626.56/oz. That doesn't include non-physical money it would also have to cover (which would total over $8T at this point...$50k/oz not happening). If the US started offering to trade $5600/oz, the market price would quickly match it. Unlikely it would happen though as it would cause some serious market chaos.
 

Neo

Badfish
Messages
1,666
Location
Brookings, OR
so they would have trouble doing all that . plus backing 16+ trillion WITH A "T" debt , it aint happening . and a dollar wont be worth $hit if it takes 7,000 of em to buy an ounce . yikes we are so screwed , i actually feel real bad for my neice and nephew and the next couple of generations . the $hit they'll see .
 
Top