Can007
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 361
- Location
- Palmdale, CA
Just finished installing a volant cold air intake. Man o Man what a difference!!!!
Nopethats gotta be an alpha engine ??
Where is it drawing air from?
Same as stock
FenderWhere is it drawing air from?
YesDid u keep the oem stuff?
Unfortunately not. It’s the 3.5Lthats gotta be an alpha engine ??
ok that explains why it looks nothing like the 3.7Unfortunately not. It’s the 3.5L
The engine is relatively the same as 3.7 my understanding is the 3.7 is just an improved motor (internally)? They look identicalok that explains why it looks nothing like the 3.7
stats i read about the diff, 3.5 got like 2 mpg better then 3.7The engine is relatively the same as 3.7 my understanding is the 3.7 is just an improved motor (internally)? They look identical
Very nice. Would you have a part number or recommendations for purchase?Just finished installing a volant cold air intake. Man o Man what a difference!!!!
View attachment 32855
Before you buy…. Make a final decision if you want a snorkel or cold air intake. The air intake system is obsolete if you want to go with a snorkel system. Just something to consider.Very nice. Would you have a part number or recommendations for purchase?
I wish. I hate saying this but the 3.5L is simply under powered.stats i read about the diff, 3.5 got like 2 mpg better then 3.7
It's considered cold since the intake air comes from outside of the engine bay (just like stock). As for waterproof/snorkel, the stock intake location is (according to GM) good for 24" of water. Regardless, I don't see anything on a snorkel intake that would conflict with your Volant system, so...lol, I am not sure if it a true cold air intake (Unless you are running a scoop hood with direct airflow) but it definitely runs better.
The sad part is I am considering installing a snorkel so don’t know if I am going to keep this set up because it’s not wate proof. I am not 100% what to do.
It's considered cold since the intake air comes from outside of the engine bay (just like stock). As for waterproof/snorkel, the stock intake location is (according to GM) good for 24" of water. Regardless, I don't see anything on a snorkel intake that would conflict with your Volant system, so...
highly doubt the 3.7 is any better !! i have to shift down on the hwy for any big hillI wish. I hate saying this but the 3.5L is simply under powered.
Hmmm...wonder if you could add some rubber weather stripping to seal it?I bought the volant system thinking I would be able to use it as a true snorkel/cold air intake but the box is not water sealed like the stock box. The stock box would be better for snorkel setup. Although, I would prefer a water proof setup like some of the H4O members here.
Thanks for the link and the food for thought. In the beginning stages of replacing and building my refurbishedBefore you buy…. Make a final decision if you want a snorkel or cold air intake. The air intake system is obsolete if you want to go with a snorkel system. Just something to consider.
I got mine from eBay…
Volant 15535 Closed Box Cold Air Intake- 2004-2006 Chevrolet Colorado 3.5L V6 | eBay
2004-2006 Chevrolet Colorado 3.5L V6. 2004-2006 GMC Canyon 3.5L V6. PowerCore Filter (CARB EO# D-526-8 ).www.ebay.com
Would you know if the Volant 15535 would pass emissions/CARB on the 2006 3.5L H3? Any thoughts or experience with the K & N system. I am aware they are two completely different systems. One better than the other? I'm not keen on the look of the K & N aesthetic in the engine bay but if it works I am open to it. I like the idea of the snorkel but again not sure about Cali regulations of late. Plus any performance enhancements as well. Any additional helpful information is welcomed. ThanksThanks for the link and the food for thought. In the beginning stages of replacing and building my refurbished
1. Yes both systems would pass smog.Would you know if the Volant 15535 would pass emissions/CARB on the 2006 3.5L H3? Any thoughts or experience with the K & N system. I am aware they are two completely different systems. One better than the other? I'm not keen on the look of the K & N aesthetic in the engine bay but if it works I am open to it. I like the idea of the snorkel but again not sure about Cali regulations of late. Plus any performance enhancements as well. Any additional helpful information is welcomed. Thanks