Yes, but both will fit. When I got my Bilstein I realized the larger bottom eye was hitting the skid. It's not much but enough you can see wear on the skid. Since to me one of the most important features of this "skid" is to protect the lower shock mount and the bolt from damage I want to make them to allow the skid to fit flush with the spring plate but not touch the shock. The shock should not be any lower than the skid in my opinion, if so what's the point of the skid design? If the eye is scraping it will only be a matter of time before that is either ground off or takes direct hit from a rock from scraping over rock shelves.
Actually the last big batch was made with the rear bend starting further back. They had been for some reason adding a second bend.
Now it stays flat past the first bend and then goes up at 70 degrees. This also makes the rear upper edge a bit shorter under the springs.
This first damaged spring plate is not mine but been around awhile. It shows how a "skid" will work better than the oem or any flat plate with a front vertical edge, to avoid blunt force trauma and allow the vehicle to slide over this area. Yeah, you lose 1/4 inch clearance but it saves the shock.
This is my first test of the skids, it also shows that the oem plate with skid added can help prevent damage to the tank skid by supporting the rear as it comes down off of rocks. In my case without the shock skid the tank skid rear edge will take more hits until a mounting tab breaks off, then the welded on balance weight on my drive shaft knocked on the tank skid and sounded like a broken axle. I went home and made the skids.
Here is an example of another brand skid that is not wide enough.
and what happens without the front ones