We still live in a country where criminal punishment requires hard evidence of wrong doing.
Trump had 4 years as president, with the full resources of the federal government, to investigate and prove his claim that 3 million illegal votes cost him the popular vote victory. In 4 years he couldn't unearth one shred of tangible evidence exposing this grand conspiracy against our democracy.
Now we're supposed to believe this same all-powerful conspiracy is simultaneously stealing the presidency, but couldn't flip the senate, and lost seats in the house. They're powerful and competent enough to steal the presidency, but not powerful or competent enough to steal congress? Which is it?
There has never been an investigation showing voter fraud successfully swinging regional or state level elections, let alone national ones.
I question everything going on around me. Right now, that question is, where is the proof?
Anyone guilty of this should be shot for treason. But you can't do that without evidence.
Where is it?
Bookmarks